<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Jacob Kramer-Duffield thinks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jacob.kramer-duffield.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jacob.kramer-duffield.com</link>
	<description>JKD's periodic thoughts on identity, technology and democracy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 07:34:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Research and Generalizability by matt nathanson fan</title>
		<link>http://jacob.kramer-duffield.com/2009/11/18/research-and-generalizability/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>matt nathanson fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 07:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jacob.kramer-duffield.com/?p=154#comment-226</guid>
		<description>Good post, I look forward to the rest</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post, I look forward to the rest</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Beyond Beacon by Mark</title>
		<link>http://jacob.kramer-duffield.com/2007/11/21/beyond-beacon/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 11:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jacob.kramer-duffield.com/2007/11/21/beyond-beacon/#comment-222</guid>
		<description>I really liked that post, I am a little confused, and have a tiny question. May I send you an email?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really liked that post, I am a little confused, and have a tiny question. May I send you an email?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Future of Publishing (part n in continuing series) by Richard Nash</title>
		<link>http://jacob.kramer-duffield.com/2010/01/11/the-future-of-publishing-part-n-in-continuing-series/#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Nash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 05:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jacob.kramer-duffield.com/?p=169#comment-221</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the thumbs-up! And in terms of the critique of the B&amp;N issue—all excellent points, and ones I basically agree with, except to note that in the end, B&amp;N lacks a real raison d&#039;etre. The superstore is designed to offer A. choice, and B. an experience. But Amazon trumps them on choice, and their margins just aren&#039;t good enough to invest in experience the way other retailers can. So you list reasons, all correct, why they won&#039;t go out of business, but when they lack a compelling reason to stay in business, as I think they lack, then I conclude it can&#039;t survive indefinitely. Their legacy situation is good in all the ways you describe, especially good leases, but the decade will eat away at many of their advantages, I suspect. I would certainly concede it comes towards the end of the decade barring a combination of the Nook tanking and ownership/management distraction in relation to the speculators circling around it after they implemented their poison pill defense. But, sure, I was pushing it, on the decade...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the thumbs-up! And in terms of the critique of the B&amp;N issue—all excellent points, and ones I basically agree with, except to note that in the end, B&amp;N lacks a real raison d&#8217;etre. The superstore is designed to offer A. choice, and B. an experience. But Amazon trumps them on choice, and their margins just aren&#8217;t good enough to invest in experience the way other retailers can. So you list reasons, all correct, why they won&#8217;t go out of business, but when they lack a compelling reason to stay in business, as I think they lack, then I conclude it can&#8217;t survive indefinitely. Their legacy situation is good in all the ways you describe, especially good leases, but the decade will eat away at many of their advantages, I suspect. I would certainly concede it comes towards the end of the decade barring a combination of the Nook tanking and ownership/management distraction in relation to the speculators circling around it after they implemented their poison pill defense. But, sure, I was pushing it, on the decade&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Future of Publishing (part n in continuing series) by wilbur</title>
		<link>http://jacob.kramer-duffield.com/2010/01/11/the-future-of-publishing-part-n-in-continuing-series/#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator>wilbur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 19:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jacob.kramer-duffield.com/?p=169#comment-220</guid>
		<description>Nice.  I just came from a panel discussion of IP lawyers on the Google Books settlement.  Not the most earth-shattering conversation--as you can imagine, people really got riled up about out-of-print books where it&#039;s unclear whether the publisher or author owns the copyright.  I have to admire Google for having an outrageously ambitious goal, and not letting the lawyers stop them from pulling it off.

Anyway, I agree completely that B&amp;N isn&#039;t going out of business anytime soon. It&#039;s interesting to look at what Amazon is doing: even as they&#039;re becoming a better bookseller with the e-reader business, Amazon has entrenched itself as a retailer of an impressively diverse set of products.

The bottom line is that the businesses that survive will be those that adapt continuously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice.  I just came from a panel discussion of IP lawyers on the Google Books settlement.  Not the most earth-shattering conversation&#8211;as you can imagine, people really got riled up about out-of-print books where it&#8217;s unclear whether the publisher or author owns the copyright.  I have to admire Google for having an outrageously ambitious goal, and not letting the lawyers stop them from pulling it off.</p>
<p>Anyway, I agree completely that B&amp;N isn&#8217;t going out of business anytime soon. It&#8217;s interesting to look at what Amazon is doing: even as they&#8217;re becoming a better bookseller with the e-reader business, Amazon has entrenched itself as a retailer of an impressively diverse set of products.</p>
<p>The bottom line is that the businesses that survive will be those that adapt continuously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Creation&#8221; and the Comfort of Easy Conclusions by John</title>
		<link>http://jacob.kramer-duffield.com/2009/09/15/creation-and-the-comfort-of-easy-conclusions/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 05:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jacob.kramer-duffield.com/?p=138#comment-196</guid>
		<description>I like your theory.

(Man, it&#039;s been a while since I left a comment on a blog. *shakes fist at twitter and facebook*)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your theory.</p>
<p>(Man, it&#8217;s been a while since I left a comment on a blog. *shakes fist at twitter and facebook*)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Future Academic Discourse by AuBergren Wed. 4/15 &#171; addedentry.com</title>
		<link>http://jacob.kramer-duffield.com/2009/03/26/a-future-academic-discourse/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>AuBergren Wed. 4/15 &#171; addedentry.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jacob.kramer-duffield.com/?p=123#comment-195</guid>
		<description>[...] A Future Academic Discourse &#171; Jacob Kramer-Duffield thinks [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A Future Academic Discourse &laquo; Jacob Kramer-Duffield thinks [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Facebook and Who We Want to Be by Mike Brown</title>
		<link>http://jacob.kramer-duffield.com/2009/03/16/facebook-and-who-we-want-to-be/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 20:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jacob.kramer-duffield.com/?p=117#comment-124</guid>
		<description>Hi Jacob. I did a literature review recently on issues related to sense of community, community attachment, etc. (in the physical not the virtual world). 

Particularly in the criminology/sociology literature is the idea of social control, that having enough people who know you or who are at least keeping an eye out on you or for you can be enough to curb crime. One of the studies I read said neighbors really only needed to see each other once a year (such as at a neighborhood cookout) for there to be a significant drop in burglaries and robberies. 

I wonder if, by creating a personal community of long-time friends, we&#039;re creating a form of social control for ourselves. That can be bad as well as good, but it does kind of externalize the ideals we&#039;d like to think we believe in. (But then when you leave a community...when I stopped attending Southern Baptist churches, I lost touch with many people I&#039;d grown up with.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jacob. I did a literature review recently on issues related to sense of community, community attachment, etc. (in the physical not the virtual world). </p>
<p>Particularly in the criminology/sociology literature is the idea of social control, that having enough people who know you or who are at least keeping an eye out on you or for you can be enough to curb crime. One of the studies I read said neighbors really only needed to see each other once a year (such as at a neighborhood cookout) for there to be a significant drop in burglaries and robberies. </p>
<p>I wonder if, by creating a personal community of long-time friends, we&#8217;re creating a form of social control for ourselves. That can be bad as well as good, but it does kind of externalize the ideals we&#8217;d like to think we believe in. (But then when you leave a community&#8230;when I stopped attending Southern Baptist churches, I lost touch with many people I&#8217;d grown up with.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Song of the Day/Question of the Day 20081217 by ap</title>
		<link>http://jacob.kramer-duffield.com/2008/12/17/song-of-the-dayquestion-of-the-day-20081217/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>ap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jacob.kramer-duffield.com/?p=99#comment-121</guid>
		<description>Read &quot;The structure of scientific revolutions&quot; Thomas Kuhn for an elaborate discussion of this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read &#8220;The structure of scientific revolutions&#8221; Thomas Kuhn for an elaborate discussion of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Post-Interstitiality by Hill</title>
		<link>http://jacob.kramer-duffield.com/2009/03/18/post-interstitiality/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jacob.kramer-duffield.com/?p=120#comment-120</guid>
		<description>interstices...i knew you were a Foucaultian at heart.  that is, if Foucaultians had hearts.  so yes, everything that happens will happen today.  good post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interstices&#8230;i knew you were a Foucaultian at heart.  that is, if Foucaultians had hearts.  so yes, everything that happens will happen today.  good post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Context and Power by lilly</title>
		<link>http://jacob.kramer-duffield.com/2009/02/02/context-and-power/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>lilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jacob.kramer-duffield.com/?p=108#comment-118</guid>
		<description>Right on. 

Has it also not occured to him that it is work like Ehrenreich&#039;s (written a decade ago) that might have actually affected conditions in these sorts of work places?

Platt sounds frustrating...almost intentionally dense. But i&#039;ve never liked boing-boing much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on. </p>
<p>Has it also not occured to him that it is work like Ehrenreich&#8217;s (written a decade ago) that might have actually affected conditions in these sorts of work places?</p>
<p>Platt sounds frustrating&#8230;almost intentionally dense. But i&#8217;ve never liked boing-boing much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
