<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Future of Publishing (part n in continuing series)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jacob.kramer-duffield.com/2010/01/11/the-future-of-publishing-part-n-in-continuing-series/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jacob.kramer-duffield.com/2010/01/11/the-future-of-publishing-part-n-in-continuing-series/</link>
	<description>JKD&#039;s periodic thoughts on identity, technology and democracy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 22:27:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Nash</title>
		<link>http://jacob.kramer-duffield.com/2010/01/11/the-future-of-publishing-part-n-in-continuing-series/#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Nash]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 05:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jacob.kramer-duffield.com/?p=169#comment-221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the thumbs-up! And in terms of the critique of the B&amp;N issue—all excellent points, and ones I basically agree with, except to note that in the end, B&amp;N lacks a real raison d&#039;etre. The superstore is designed to offer A. choice, and B. an experience. But Amazon trumps them on choice, and their margins just aren&#039;t good enough to invest in experience the way other retailers can. So you list reasons, all correct, why they won&#039;t go out of business, but when they lack a compelling reason to stay in business, as I think they lack, then I conclude it can&#039;t survive indefinitely. Their legacy situation is good in all the ways you describe, especially good leases, but the decade will eat away at many of their advantages, I suspect. I would certainly concede it comes towards the end of the decade barring a combination of the Nook tanking and ownership/management distraction in relation to the speculators circling around it after they implemented their poison pill defense. But, sure, I was pushing it, on the decade...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the thumbs-up! And in terms of the critique of the B&amp;N issue—all excellent points, and ones I basically agree with, except to note that in the end, B&amp;N lacks a real raison d&#8217;etre. The superstore is designed to offer A. choice, and B. an experience. But Amazon trumps them on choice, and their margins just aren&#8217;t good enough to invest in experience the way other retailers can. So you list reasons, all correct, why they won&#8217;t go out of business, but when they lack a compelling reason to stay in business, as I think they lack, then I conclude it can&#8217;t survive indefinitely. Their legacy situation is good in all the ways you describe, especially good leases, but the decade will eat away at many of their advantages, I suspect. I would certainly concede it comes towards the end of the decade barring a combination of the Nook tanking and ownership/management distraction in relation to the speculators circling around it after they implemented their poison pill defense. But, sure, I was pushing it, on the decade&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wilbur</title>
		<link>http://jacob.kramer-duffield.com/2010/01/11/the-future-of-publishing-part-n-in-continuing-series/#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wilbur]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 19:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jacob.kramer-duffield.com/?p=169#comment-220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice.  I just came from a panel discussion of IP lawyers on the Google Books settlement.  Not the most earth-shattering conversation--as you can imagine, people really got riled up about out-of-print books where it&#039;s unclear whether the publisher or author owns the copyright.  I have to admire Google for having an outrageously ambitious goal, and not letting the lawyers stop them from pulling it off.

Anyway, I agree completely that B&amp;N isn&#039;t going out of business anytime soon. It&#039;s interesting to look at what Amazon is doing: even as they&#039;re becoming a better bookseller with the e-reader business, Amazon has entrenched itself as a retailer of an impressively diverse set of products.

The bottom line is that the businesses that survive will be those that adapt continuously.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice.  I just came from a panel discussion of IP lawyers on the Google Books settlement.  Not the most earth-shattering conversation&#8211;as you can imagine, people really got riled up about out-of-print books where it&#8217;s unclear whether the publisher or author owns the copyright.  I have to admire Google for having an outrageously ambitious goal, and not letting the lawyers stop them from pulling it off.</p>
<p>Anyway, I agree completely that B&amp;N isn&#8217;t going out of business anytime soon. It&#8217;s interesting to look at what Amazon is doing: even as they&#8217;re becoming a better bookseller with the e-reader business, Amazon has entrenched itself as a retailer of an impressively diverse set of products.</p>
<p>The bottom line is that the businesses that survive will be those that adapt continuously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

